Designing a protein autonomy pilot
Choosing the wedge line, defining the success metric, setting the gates and structuring the exit terms.
Practical guides written for plant directors, yield engineers and quality managers — not for a marketing funnel.
Choosing the wedge line, defining the success metric, setting the gates and structuring the exit terms.
Baselines, carcass-mix matching, reconciliation windows and statistical significance.
How to bring quality and HACCP owners along, and what evidence they will require.
Segmentation, identity, stop-path independence and change control for IT/OT teams.
From weight prediction to batch composition to closed-loop checkweigher control.
Modelling output stability against vacancy rates on the cut floor.
Long-form, practical documents you can hand to a colleague who was not in the meeting.
Measured results and methodology from design-partner lines, with baselines stated. [PLACEHOLDER]
Recorded sessions with plant directors, yield engineers and quality managers.
Architecture, controls, validation protocols and evidence formats for your auditors.
Agent API, connector SDK and edge deployment documentation.
Yield, giveaway, labour and safety models built with your own line data.
Quality leaders from three processors on resolving the escape-versus-false-reject trade-off.
A blow-by-blow account of shadow baselining through to supervised autonomy.
Where autonomous decisions sit in a control plan, and what evidence auditors expect.
Most automation pilots end ambiguously because the metric, the baseline and the exit terms were never agreed. This guide gives you the structure we use with every design partner — including the parts that let you walk away cleanly.
ROI modelling, payback, labour resilience and how to structure a pilot that gives you a defensible answer.
Cut planning, twin validation, program rollout and yield measurement methodology.
Evidence design, HACCP alignment, model change control and audit-ready exports.
Network segmentation, identity, edge architecture, stop-path independence and change control.
Every plant gets isolated data, models and vector stores. Cut recipes and species models never cross a tenant boundary — federated learning shares patterns, never your product IP.
Immutable logs link sensor frames, model version, autonomy level, approvals, overrides and outcomes for every agent action — built for recall defence and model governance.
Blade, robot and line stops are deterministic and independent of the cloud. Graceful degradation returns the cell to a safe state if perception confidence drops.
“The line does not care that every bird is different — Slicium does. We stopped programming a machine and started supervising an operator that adapts to each carcass.”
“Giveaway was the quiet leak nobody could close. Watching the portioner hold target within a couple of grams, shift after shift, changed the economics of the whole pack line.”
“What sold my team was the audit trail. Every reject links back to the frame, the model version and who approved the autonomy level. That is what a recall investigation actually needs.”
Design-partner quotes are composite and pending publication approval. [PLACEHOLDER]
Guides and technical references are open. The security and validation pack and customer references require a short conversation, because they contain customer-specific material we are contractually obliged to protect.
Results are reconciled against each customer’s own MES and finance systems rather than our telemetry. Where a figure is provisional or from a small cohort, it is marked as such. [PLACEHOLDER]
A typical pilot runs one line for 8–12 weeks: two weeks of integration and shadow-mode baselining, four to six weeks of advisory operation, then graduated autonomy against the agreed success metric. Connectors for common cutting, grading, X-ray, portioning and MES systems are pre-built. [PLACEHOLDER]
Three tiers: Line at $12,000 per processing line per month for one workflow, Plant at $80,000 per month for the whole loop including the twin, and Enterprise custom agreements for multi-site fleets. Annual prepay saves 15–20%, and outcome-based components can be tied to yield, giveaway, labour or safety.
Architecture, controls, validation protocols and evidence formats — sent after a short call with your reviewers.